US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,394
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Superintendent MCI Shirley
as 1:2024cv10057
Petitioner:
Maurice Morrison
Respondent:
Superintendent MCI Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10045
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10052
Petitioner:
Arthur E. Salsbury
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10050
Petitioner:
Arthur E. Salsbury and Arthur E. Salsbury, Jr.
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piard v. Stanley
as 4:2024cv40004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kelly Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Hakala et al
as 4:2023cv40180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Officer Hakala and Officer Bariamis
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Dunn v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 1:20-cr-10198-FDS-4
as 1:2023cv13206
Petitioner:
Patrick Dunn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schmitt v. Bowers
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner:
Thomas Schmitt
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
