Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Walsh v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv40154
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Walsh, Jr.
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Collins v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11831
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Collins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Perez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv30075
Plaintiff:
Eudith Perez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
La Monde v. IRS Federal
as 1:2023cv11256
Plaintiff:
Frank La Monde
Defendant:
IRS Federal
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Ramos v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv40105
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harley v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10796
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stephen T Harley
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Devine v Saul
as 1:2021cv10129
Plaintiff:
Zachary Devine
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramaella v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30162
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mercy Ramaella
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mercado v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2019cv11172
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. Attorney Massachusetts and Attorney General USA
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rosario Mercado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Augustin v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv10761
Plaintiff:
Nirlande Augustin
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
