District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 67,267
United States of America v. Pena
as 1:2024cv11061
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eva Pena
Molyneux v. Commission of Social Security
as 1:2024cv11052
Plaintiff:
Felicia Molyneux
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kennedy et al v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv30057
Plaintiff:
Kim A Kennedy and Unum Group
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
J'Adore, LLC v. Morgan et al
as 1:2024cv11038
Plaintiff:
J'Adore, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Morgan and JB Morgan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Stile Societa Cooperativa v. Brickman et al
as 1:2024cv11040
Plaintiff:
Stile Societa Cooperativa
Defendant:
Howard Brickman and Brickman Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melendez v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11036
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melendez
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maurice v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11037
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lipscomb v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11044
Plaintiff:
William Lipscomb
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11043
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeAngelo v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11050
Plaintiff:
Frank DeAngelo
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
