U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,040
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryant v. McLean, et al
as 24-1123
Plaintiff:
JAMUS ORAN BRYANT
Defendant:
BONNIE HEATHER MCLEAN, in her official and individual capacities, CHRISTINA APOSTOLI, in her official and individual capacities, FRANK ANTHONY MOSCHETTI, in his official and individual capacities and others
Cousik, et al v. Winters, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
TARIN ALLEN, TEJAS COUSIK, JAKE DOUGLAS and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA WINTERS, Aurora Police Officer, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, AUSTIN RUNYON, Aurora Police Officer and others
Runkle v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
AMY M. RUNKLE
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MICHAEL MARTINEZ, Former Chief Judge and others
Nelson v. Mayorkas
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
CAMERON NELSON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United Department of Homeland Security
DeVaughn v. County of Meade, et al
as 24-3050
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MEADE and UNKNOWN OFFICER, Patrol Officer, Badge #180, co#60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant:
JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
