Tenth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,857
Knight et al v. AT&T Inc
as 5:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Sam Knight
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kane v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kane
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Store #374
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Valdez v. Kelson
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jesus Valdez
Defendant:
Shadat Kelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Schlegel v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Amnon Schlegel
Defendant:
United States, University of Utah, Debra Anderton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Madson v. Spira
as 1:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Kelly Madson
Defendant:
Kyle Spira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lopez v. Walmart, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lopez
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cox et al v. Apollo Hospitality Firm, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Linda Cox and Bradley Cox
Defendant:
Apollo Hospitality Firm, LLC doing business as LaQuinta Inn & Suites by Wyndham Ardmore and Rina 1 Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hodges v. Doctors Property Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A Hodges
Defendant:
Doctors Property Management, LLC, Robert Justin Marting, Haven CB, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Loudermill v. Burchett
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Floyd Burchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Foote v. Hamilton
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Patrick Foote
Defendant:
William Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
