District of Colorado Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 799
Sheron v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff: Danette Marie Sheron
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Social Security Appeal Council
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff: Johnny A. Taylor
Defendant: Social Security Appeal Council
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huerta v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01032
Plaintiff: Blas Luz Huerta
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01019
Plaintiff: Pamela J. Williams
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Castor v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00990
Plaintiff: Michelle R. Castor
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bryant v. Boudreau et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00980
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Anne Bryant
Defendant: Debra Boudreau, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sheeley v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00963
Petitioner: Ryanne Jolynn Sheeley
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Miscellaneou: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Shinholster v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00926
Plaintiff: Shantae Shinholster
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benenfits
Barger v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00897
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Barger
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pringle v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00892
Plaintiff: Laurie Pringle
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: - Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.