US District Court for the District of Wyoming Torts - Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 69
JPMKL Inc v. Western Express Inc
as 2:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
JPMKL Inc
Defendant:
Western Express Inc and Sentry Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
England v. Swift Transportation CO of Arizona LLC
as 2:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
C R England
Defendant:
Swift Transportation CO of Arizona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marten Transport Ltd v. B&R Oilfield Inc
as 2:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Marten Transport Ltd
Defendant:
B&R Oilfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rossmann v. Marks
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Arthur Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shams v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ziaush Shams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Micke v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Keith Micke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Rangel v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Candy Rangel
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whos Your Daddy Productions LLC et al v. Association of Boxing Commissions et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Whos Your Daddy Productions LLC and Corey Williams
Defendant:
Association of Boxing Commissions, Association of Boxing Commissions President, Riverton Wyoming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Casper v. Corrigan
as 1:2014cv00225
Defendant:
Edward Marvin Corrigan
Plaintiff:
City of Casper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners v. Simons Petroleum Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners
Defendant:
Simons Petroleum Inc , Simons Petroleum LLC and Pilot Logistics Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
