Eleventh Circuit Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 754
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company et al
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC, High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and others
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC v. G&C Fab-Con LLC et al
as 9:2023cv81364
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC
Defendant: G&C Fab-Con LLC, Everest Reinsurance Company, Sunflower Landscaping Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Everest Reinsurance Co. et al
as 9:2023cv81366
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC, SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Everest Reinsurance Co., G&C Fab-Con LLC, Sunflower Landscaping, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Conner Development Group, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of CONNER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., and Conner Development Group, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. et al v. Poettker Construction Company et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Counter Defendant: United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blankenship Group, Inc.
Defendant: Poettker Construction Company, Zodiac-Poettker HBZ Joint Venture II, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Sand Point Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of QUALITY GLASS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: Sand Point Services, LLC, Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. D&M Construction, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv00865
Plaintiff: United States of America and STAY DRY ROOFING, LLC
Defendant: D&M CONSTRUCTION, INC. n/k/a FORESIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, BLUE STAR ROOFING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?