Eleventh Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 266
Holmes v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Craig Holmes
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Stanley v. Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Savannah Port Terminal Railroad, Inc. and Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Stanley
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jones v. Murphy et al
as 1:2019cv05204
Defendant:
Michael Murphy and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Myrick v. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01417
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc, Omnitrax Inc and Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC
Plaintiff:
Donald J Myrick
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Pelkey v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01284
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc and Keith Sweeny
Plaintiff:
Todd Pelkey
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Dively v. Premier Compounding Pharmacy, INC. et al
as 9:2019cv80921
Defendant:
Tracy L. Christian and Premier Compounding Pharmacy, INC.
Plaintiff:
Dale Dively
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Singleton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv03133
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Singleton
Defendant:
Jonathan Henson, Cortez Mason, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Cotton et al v. Walden et al
as 2:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc, Jerry Glen Walden and Christopher Thomas James
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Cotton and Keith Richard Cotton
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Turner et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
Felix Garrett and Dewayne Turner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thomas v. Norfolk Southrn Railway Company
as 1:2019cv02043
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Rufus Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
