Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 156,782
CANNON v. CHASE et al
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
ANTWOINE CANNON
Defendant:
CHASE and FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. RALPH et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Defendant:
A RALPH and C CASWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant:
J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELAZQUEZ v. WILSON
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Tyrone Lenard Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Richard Bryson
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadwick v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Chadwick
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McPherson et al v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
