Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 88,027
Burts v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Petitioner: Tyrone Burts
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BARROW
as 5:2015cv00186
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent: DONALD BARROW
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NELSON v. MATHIS et al
as 5:2015cv00185
Plaintiff: JURDIS NELSON
Defendant: MATHIS, FOYE, WOODSON
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dianne (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff: Jack A. Davis
Defendant: Nurse Dianne
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dixon et al
as 1:2015cv00273
Petitioner: James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Respondent: Hallie Scott Dixon, Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2015cv00184
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE SMITH
Defendant: CHARLES BRYANT, ALFONZO HILL
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Driver v. Novy et al
as 6:2015cv00055
Plaintiff: Fredrick Driver
Defendant: Sanda Novy, Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. LEAVINS
as 5:2015cv00112
Plaintiff: AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant: D LEAVINS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv61082
Plaintiff: Andrew Mitchell
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blome v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2015cv61083
Plaintiff: Richard Blome
Defendant: Broward County Sheriff, Sandra Sternal, Ms., Raymon Leonardo, Mr. and others
Cause Of Action: State Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.