Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56,108
Letterlough v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Nyree Letterlough
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNOX v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KNOX
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bango, Noel v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80424
Plaintiff:
Noel K. Bango
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herman, Jr., Randy v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80425
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Herman, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mark Bradley Boyd
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleckler v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
