Eleventh Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Other Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,802
United States of America v. $3,031,059.45 in U.S. Currency Funds Seized from JP Morgan Chase Account Ending in #5012, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $3,031,059.45 in U.S. Currency Funds Seized from JP Morgan Chase Account Ending in #5012, et al.
Claimant: Diamond Bazar, Sirag Gold, Inc., Talfel, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. All Funds In Any Form, including USDT Or Any Other Cryptocurrency of FIAT previously stored in or accessible via Binance Account Bearing User ID 111070305, 68407402, 152160928
as 6:2023cv00710
Defendant: United States of America and All Funds In Any Form, including USDT Or Any Other Cryptocurrency of FIAT previously stored in or accessible via Binance Account Bearing User ID 111070305,68407402, 152160928
Claimant: Shijie Song
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
United States of America v. APPROXIMATELY $1,181,089.93 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NO. 229059388826 IN THE NAME OF BEST WAY MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.
as 1:2023cv21477
Defendant: United States of America and Approximately $1,181,089.93 in U.S. Currency seized from Bank of America account no. 229059388826 in the name of Best Way Medical Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
United States of America v. 17 Assorted Firearms and 720 Rounds of Ammunition, More Particularly Described in Attachment A
as 1:2023cv01366
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 17 Assorted Firearms and 720 Rounds of Ammunition, More Particularly Described in Attachment A, Taurus G2C Pistol CAL:9 SN:ADL951742, identified as asset number 23-ATF-003707, Taurus G2C Pistol CAL:9 SN:ADE424938, identified as asset number 23-ATF-003713 and others
United States of America v. IN RE: ONE (1) 2022 FERRARI F8 TRIBUTO (CATS NO. 22-DEA-696212)
as 1:2023mc21170
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: IN RE: ONE (1) 2022 FERRARI F8 TRIBUTO (CATS NO. 22-DEA-696212)
Claimant: Melik Najim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
United States of America v. Approximately $504,728.89 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5526898522 et al
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $504,728.89 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5526898522 and Approximately $265,036.43 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5526898530
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,343,755.45+/- UNITED STATES CURRENCY TO BE SEIZED FROM TYNDALL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACCT # XXX3052
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $1,343,755.45+/- UNITED STATES CURRENCY TO BE SEIZED FROM TYNDALL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACCT # XXX3052
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00182
Plaintiff: United States of America (IRS) and United States of America
Defendant: Thomas Lamb, Lawrence Lamb and Thomas Lamb, III
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. $27,725.48 US Currency et al
as 1:2023cv20453
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY $27,725.48 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN ACCOUNT NO. 9147782718 AT CITIBANK, AND APPROXIMATELY $28,011.54 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN AC, $27,725.48 US Currency and $28,011.54 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
United States of America v. Balderrama
as 0:2023cv60158
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Natalio A. Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?