US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Crown Cary Park LP et al v. Kester
as 2:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Crown Cary Park LP , Crowne at Cahaba Associates LP , Crowne Maybank Apartments LP and others
Defendant:
Larry C Kester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Fedoseyev v. ESI Group Inc
as 5:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Fedoseyev
Defendant:
ESI Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Crutchfield Dermatology PA et al v. Riggins et al
as 4:2016cv00985
Plaintiff:
Crutchfield Dermatology PA and Dr. Charles E Crutchfield, III
Defendant:
Dr. Murray J Riggins, Jr and Doc Riggins Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Wooten v. Herndon et al
as 2:2016cv00839
Plaintiff:
Neal Wooten
Defendant:
Mark Herndon and The Fresh Ink Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Robertson v. Kardashian
as 2:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matthew Robertson
Defendant:
Armen Kardashian
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Glennon v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00804
Plaintiff:
Monika Glennon
Defendant:
John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Advanced Structural Design Inc v. Hopkins et al
as 5:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Advanced Structural Design Inc
Defendant:
Bill Hopkins, Morgan County (Alabama) Board of Education, Volkert Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Davis
as 3:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc , Universal-Songs of Polygram International Inc , Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Defendant:
Andrew Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Fedoseyev v. CFD Research Corporation
as 5:2015cv02321
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Fedoseyev
Defendant:
CFD Research Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
The Mane Choice Hair Solutions, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 5:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
The Mane Choice Hair Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
