US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Winston v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kennedy L Winston
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway and Fanduel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
MMR Constructors, Inc. v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
MMR Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Buchanan and Moody's Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Selma Oil Mill, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Selma Oil Mill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Nobile Americas Corporation v. SDR Trucking and Logistics Management Solutions
as 1:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
Nobile Americas Corporation, Nobile Americas Corporation and Nobile Americas Corporation
Defendant:
SDR Trucking and Logistics Management Solutions
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Homeowners Loan Corp. v. Martin et al
as 1:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
Homeowners Loan Corp.
Defendant:
Eddie W. Martin and Cynthia P. Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Lion Chemical Industries, Incorporated
as 1:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Lion Chemical Industries, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
McWhorter v. ATS Logistics Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv00644
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
McWhorter et al v. Mason and Dixon Logistics Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv00278
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
