Alabama Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
United States of America v. Birmingham Industrial Construction LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Birmingham Industrial Construction LLC, Hanover Insurance Company, The and Mills Electric Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company et al
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC, High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and others
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of EWS Texas, Inc. v. The Robins and Morton Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00288
Counter Defendant: United States of America for the use and benefit of EWS Texas, Inc.
Defendant: Robins and Morton Corporation doing business as Robins and Morton Group, Zurich American Insurance Company and The Robins and Morton Corporation doing business as Robins and Morton Group
Counter Claimant: The Robins and Morton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
Midwest Cast Stone of Kansas Inc et al v. Masonry Arts Inc et al
as 1:2022cv01487
Counter Defendant: Midwest Cast Stone of Kansas Inc
Counter Claimant: Masonry Arts Inc
Defendant: International Fidelity Insurance Company and BL Harbert International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Provision Contracting Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Provision Contracting Services, LLC, Nicholas Dowdell and United States Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Site Pros, LLC v. United States Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: United States of America and The United States of America, for the use of Site Pros, LLC
Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company and Provision Contracting Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc. v. The Gray Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc.
Defendant: The Gray Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?