District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 13,735
Lewis v. Dixon et al
as 1:2015cv00273
Petitioner: James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Respondent: Hallie Scott Dixon, Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Steward
as 1:2015cv00276
Petitioner: Neil Robinson
Respondent: Cythain Steward
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Dianne (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff: Jack A. Davis
Defendant: Nurse Dianne
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Burts v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Petitioner: Tyrone Burts
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConathy v. Wintson County Jail et al
as 6:2015cv00849
Plaintiff: Tommy McConathy
Defendant: Wintson County Jail, Sandar Esitar
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2015cv00847
Petitioner: John Baker
Respondent: State of Alabama, Madison County Alabama, Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McCollum et al
as 2:2015cv00845
Plaintiff: Demarkules Williams
Defendant: Hardy McCollum, Thomas M. Smith
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Roberts et al
as 7:2015cv00846
Plaintiff: Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant: James H Roberts, Jr, Stuart D Albea
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Myers et al
as 1:2015cv00268
Plaintiff: De'Angelo Arnez Jones
Defendant: Walter Myers, William DeSpain, Michael Everette and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Craig v. USA
as 1:2015cv00266
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Cornelius Kenyatta Craig
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.