Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,497
Jackson v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Lakeylea Andrea Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08001
Petitioner:
Gregory Wade Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Paige v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Steven Denard Paige
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beck v. USA
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Jonathon Howard Beck
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dryer v. USA
as 1:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Marcus Maurice Dryer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gajadhar v. USA
as 1:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Randy Gajadhar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dillard v. USA
as 2:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Darick Dewayne Dillard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Dale Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gissendanner v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08043
Petitioner:
Tavara Japree Gissendanner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
