Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Raybon
as 2:2022cv00368
Petitioner: Courtney Larrell Lockhart
Respondent: Warden Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Raybon et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff: Courtney Lockhart
Defendant: Terry Raybon and John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Raybon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00152
Petitioner: Joe Nathan James
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Dunn
as 1:2022cv00154
Petitioner: Anthony Stanley
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Defendant: John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
White v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01700
Petitioner: Justin Matthew White
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 1:2021cv00595
Plaintiff: Michael Jerome Lewis
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn and Terry Rayborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2021cv00362
Plaintiff: Antonio Devoe Jones
Defendant: Terry Raybon and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00504
Petitioner: Wakilii Brown
Respondent: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00325
Respondent: Jefferson S. Dunn
Petitioner: Larry Donald George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?