District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 31 - 40 of 90,010
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Vernon Guy
Respondent:
Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Brice
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tonya Robinson
Defendant:
Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Winston L. Harrison
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters and Lanetta Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chanel, Inc. v. Pettway
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Danyell Bennett Pettway d/b/a 1 of a kind Diva boutique
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinson v. Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, LLC
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Brinson
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal (Lanham Act)
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
