US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,269
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HARRIS v. AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
DESTINEE MONET HARRIS
Defendant:
AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BECK v. ROBERT JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
SEAN BECK
Defendant:
ROBERT JOHNSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF SANTA ROSA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SCARBOROUGH v. GAINEY et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Scarborough
Defendant:
Sheriff EMERY GAINEY, Deputy Kaifa Tyson and Deputy Monica Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
