US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JESSE BELL v. RICKY DIXON
as 1:2022cv00211
Petitioner:
Jesse Bell
Respondent:
Secretary RICKY DIXON and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOKER v. DIXON et al
as 3:2022cv10939
Petitioner:
STEPHEN TODD BOOKER
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOKER v. DIXON et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
STEPHEN TODD BOOKER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 5:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Daniel Jacob Craven and DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent:
Secretary Ricky Dixon, Ashley Moody and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWBERRY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2021cv00173
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
RODNEY NEWBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LONG v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2019cv00213
Defendant:
JULIA MCCALL, JIMMY T PATRONIS, JR, MELINDA N COONROD and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. JONES
as 5:2018cv00281
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES
Petitioner:
Bryan Frederick Jennings and BRYAN FREDRICK JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
