US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 26,259
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carpenter and Jordan Carpenter on behalf of the Estate of Dennis Carpernter
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Danielle Rawl, Brittney Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC D/B/A ALLIED UNIVERSAL
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE LLC doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LEE v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Antonio Leonardo Lee
Defendant:
Gregory W. Edwards and NAKIA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOG
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOG
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2156 Animal Fighting Venture Prohibition
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ANDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
