US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 19,067
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mywan D. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Veal v. Forsyth County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Veal
Defendant:
Forsyth County Detention Center, Forsyth County Road Deputies, Forsyth County Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Peachtree City P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Terell Owens
Defendant:
Peachtree City P.D. and Fayette County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Bates
Defendant:
Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. White
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner:
Jamar Scott
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
