US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 19,067
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mark Bradley Boyd
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lomax v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dialo Lomax
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and DeKalb County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres et al
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Jalon Carlos Torres and United States Pennitentary-Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Salinas
as 1:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Chaney Lewis
Defendant:
Judge Catherine M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01460
Petitioner:
Barry Brooks and Adom Brooks
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds, Shannon Wallace and Jeffrey S. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddux
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Senika Gomare Turman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
