Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 11,527
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fox v. Pinero
as 1:2024cv01168
Petitioner:
Michael Douglas Fox
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Pinero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Willis et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Fani Willis, Melynee Leftridge and Kristin Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sifuentet v. Jonet
as 1:2024cv01167
Petitioner:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentet
Respondent:
Joshua Jonet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner:
James E. Lackey
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. McFarlin
as 4:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
