Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 13,720
Lomax v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dialo Lomax
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and DeKalb County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres et al
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Jalon Carlos Torres and United States Pennitentary-Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Salinas
as 1:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Chaney Lewis
Defendant:
Judge Catherine M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
ANTAVIUS TEAZIA WILCOX
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and CORRECT HEALTH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Senika Gomare Turman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Clayton County Prison Warden Nelson et al
as 1:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
Louis Davis
Defendant:
Clayton County Prison Warden Nelson and Clayton County Prison Nurse Lisa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
