D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,341
David Lettieri v. Federal Marshals, et al
as 24-5045
Plaintiff:
David Carmine Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals, Office of General Counsel and Niagara County Jail
STOTTLEMYER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00552
Petitioner:
TARA AILEEN STOTTLEMYER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. DC ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIMITRI JOHNSON
Defendant:
DC ATTORNEY GENERAL and DC MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAIR et al v. HEALY et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE MCNAIR and JAMES MCNAIR
Defendant:
THOMAS HEALY, SUASAN BORECKI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEERIKKATTIL v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
RANJITH KEERIKKATTIL
Respondent:
COLLETE S. PETERS and WARDEN VICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Michael E. Horowitz, O.I.G, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
USA v. Bryan Burwell
as 24-3017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bryan Burwell, also known as Bush
LOPEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
DIEGO RIGOBERTO LOPEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
