D.C. Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 193
BOGUE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007mc00147
Petitioner:
SCOTT BOGUE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
In Re: EVANGELOS DIMITRIOS SOUKAS
as 1:2007mc00134
Cause Of Action: Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum & Ad Prosequendum
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
as 1:2007mc01239
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KIRT WEST
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
as 1:2007mc00123
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
KIRT WEST and KIRT WEST
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC. and CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
Movant:
JEANNIE BARRETT, JEANNIE BARRETT, JEANNIE BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: MS:Adminis
MCCLURKIN v. ROY
as 1:2007mc00118
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MCCLURKIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM ROY, III
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
ESLAVA v. GULF TELEPHONE CO.
as 1:2007mc00104
Plaintiff:
DAVID ESLAVA
Defendant:
GULF TELEPHONE CO. and GULF TELEPHONE CO.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BELL
as 1:2007mc00103
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GREGORY BELL
Movant:
EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. BUTLER
as 1:2007mc00092
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant:
TONY BUTLER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BALL et al
as 1:2007mc00085
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTWUAN BALL
Respondent:
XAVIER ELMORE
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceeding
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
