District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 315
LANG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
EDWARD JACOB LANG
Not Yet Classified:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and HERIBERTO TELLEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
V. C., B. L. and L. S.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHUBERT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS et al
as 1:2022cv03658
Plaintiff:
ALLAN D. SCHUBERT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, MICHAEL G. SEIDEL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
NICHOLS v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02356
Petitioner:
Ryan Taylor Nichols
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SLUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
CALVIN JAMES
Respondent:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOLAN v. BAKER et al
as 1:2021cv01348
Defendant:
ANDREW ESPOSITO, SUSAN MARINELLI, MARSHA BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03214
Plaintiff:
LISA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, WILLIAM P. BARR, MICHAEL CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ELIY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2020cv01066
Plaintiff:
TRAYVON ELIY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
