Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 63,042
King v. Kevin et al
as 1:2024cv02949
Plaintiff:
Kejohna King
Defendant:
Jodice Kevin, Edgar Kevin, Salazaa Gilberto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breton v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marozzi v. Interlicchia et al
as 6:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
Quentin A. Marozzi
Defendant:
Nicholas Interlicchia, Matthew Daminski, L. Strapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filyaw v. USA
as 3:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
Duane Filyaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
