US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 31 - 40 of 43,252
Robinson et al v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Karl Robinson and Niamh Bonus
Defendant:
Cheri Chisholm, Edward McCulloch and Patricia McCulloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Commissioner of Social Services v. Waterbury Gardens Nursing and Rehab, LLC of Waterbury, CT
as 3:2024cv00693
Receiver:
Katharine B. Sacks
Plaintiff:
Commissioner of Social Services
Defendant:
Waterbury Gardens Nursing and Rehab, LLC of Waterbury, CT doing business as Waterbury Gardens Nursing and Rehab
Claimant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filyaw v. USA
as 3:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
Duane Filyaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mines v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Alfred Mines
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Semple, Arone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Albert Payton
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Rowell
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
