Connecticut Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 483
Haddad v. Saul
as 5:2019cv01294
Plaintiff:
Bret Haddad
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00961
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Edwin Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Waldo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00453
Plaintiff:
Charles Waldo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Clarisol Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vogel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gail Vogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vogel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00164
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gail Vogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Good v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01984
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
William Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McCaskill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01777
Plaintiff:
Kenny Lee McCaskill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Freundlich v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01356
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Freundlich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Drogalis v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joseph John Drogalis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
