US District Court for the Northern District of New York Torts - Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 465
Harris v. Newell Brands Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Naomi Harris
Defendant:
Newell Brands Inc. and Graco Children's Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Strong v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Montana Strong
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Service Experts, LLC
as 5:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Defendant:
Service Experts, LLC doing business as Falso Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Blackmore v. Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Andre Blackmore
Defendant:
Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nelson v. Albany ENT & Allergy Services, PC
as 1:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nelson
Defendant:
Albany ENT & Allergy Services, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Berkley v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dana Berkley
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Yarbrough v. Broome County, New York et al
as 3:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Sara-Judith: Yarbrough
Defendant:
Broome County, New York, Town of Barker, New York, Jason T. Garnar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tziakas v. Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Argiro Tziakas
Defendant:
Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kovalsky v. Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Christina Kovalsky
Defendant:
Albany ENT & Allergy Services P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
