US District Court for the Northern District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Rich et al v. County of Warren et al
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rich, Cynthia Maxam, David Dellamonica and others
Defendant:
County of Warren and Christine Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oudekerk v. Lehoisky
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oudekerk
Defendant:
Nicholas Lehoisky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Imbriano v. Murray et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Joseph Imbriano
Defendant:
Mark Murray, Bobbie Murray-Jordan, Curtis Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Central Bank of West African States
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Central Bank of West African States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamil Abdul Muhammad v. Eastern Caribbean Central Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, Senator Samuel C. Dir, ACCA and Raquel Leonce C. Dir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Bank of Central African States
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Bank of Central African States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
