US District Court for the Western District of New York Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,727
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lee v. Buffalo City School District
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee
Defendant:
Buffalo City School District
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Kyocera AVX Components Corporation
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Kyocera AVX Components Corporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Umbra LLC v. The Corporations, Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2024cv00059
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dunn v. M.A.N. Sports LLC,
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dunn
Defendant:
M.A.N. Sports LLC,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Five Star Bank v. Mott et al
as 6:2024cv06153
Plaintiff:
Five Star Bank
Defendant:
Katherine Mott, Robert Harris, KRM Events, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
