Third Circuit Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,977
RSS Feed | View as table
MITCHELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01520
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MITCHELL
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PLEASANT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04832
Plaintiff: MELVIN A PLEASANT
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAMPBELL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff: MARK J CAMPBELL, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04732
Plaintiff: MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ARMONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04736
Plaintiff: LOLITA ARMONE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01480
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. DEVINE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff: DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant: MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04732
Plaintiff: MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ARMONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04736
Plaintiff: LOLITA ARMONE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SALERNO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01496
Plaintiff: THOMAS SALERNO, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?