Third Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 78
USA v. Eli Chabot, et al
as 14-4465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELI CHABOT and RENEE CHABOT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHABOT et al
as 3:2014cv03055
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ELI CHABOT and RENEE CHABOT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAROLAN et al
as 2:2013cv01825
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOUG CAROLAN, JOHN SEMANCHIK and DAVID TALLMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
WALLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv05197
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WALLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and JUSTIN BOURNE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
BONIFATTO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv05196
Petitioner:
TERESA BONIFATTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and JUSTIN BOURNE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOES et al
as 2:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN DOES and RSB CITIZENS, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Huafeng Xu v. Farkhanda Naqvi, et al
as 13-3168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUAFENG XU
Defendant - Appellee:
FARKHANDA NAQVI, MICHELLE BUSKETT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 2:2013cv01239
Petitioner:
PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
XU v. NAQVI et al
as 3:2012cv07844
Plaintiff:
HUAFENG XU
Defendant:
FARKHANDA NAQVI and MICHELLE BUSKETT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 (a) Injunctive Relief - Internal Revenue Code
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
