US District Court for the District of Delaware Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,448
Chrustowski v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
USPS, USPS Headquarters, Giant Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Chrustowski v. Best Buy
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Best Buy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hawkins v. Georgetown Police Department
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Georgetown Police Department and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Delaware State Police et al
as 1:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Delaware State Police and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hawkins v. Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Family Court and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
