US District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 19,577
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05571
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL BIDEN CABINET MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SWINT v. BOEING et al
as 1:2024cv05278
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Defendant:
BOEING, INTERNATIONAL PAPER, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOCCHINO v. CITY OF WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOCCHINO
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON v. JOHN DOE 1-Z
as 2:2024cv05229
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
