US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 129
AMALGAMATED BANK LONGVIEW FUNDS v. BOYLE et al
as 2:2017cv03404
Plaintiff:
AMALGAMATED BANK LONGVIEW FUNDS
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BOYLE , STEVE G. FILTON , LAWRENCE S. GIBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MURPHY et al v. WAJNGOLD et al
as 2:2017cv03004
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MURPHY and ARLENE MURPHY
Defendant:
DAVID WAJNGOLD and ANDREA WAJNGOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
VACEK v. AWAD et al
as 2:2017cv02820
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. VACEK, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE M. AWAD, DANIEL G. BELTZMAN, MICHAEL M. BHASKARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HEED v. MILLER et al
as 2:2017cv01476
Plaintiff:
DAVID HEED
Defendant:
ALAN B. MILLER , MARC D. MILLER , STEVE G. FILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROY v. THE CHARTWELL LAW OFFICES, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. TROY
Defendant:
THE CHARTWELL LAW OFFICES, LLP , CLIFFORD GOLDSTEIN and THOMAS STROHMETZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARTINEZ v. BLACK DIAMOND VIDEO, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
MANUEL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
BLACK DIAMOND VIDEO, INC. , STERIS, INCORPORATED , EDWARD PRIEST and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
DUGONG LLC v. PULSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05551
Petitioner:
DUGONG LLC
Respondent:
PULSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
EGYES et al v. CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv05535
Plaintiff:
PAUL EGYES and JOAN EGYES
Defendant:
CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KURTZ v. MCCARTHY et al
as 2:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KURTZ
Defendant:
BRIAN M. MCCARTHY , ADAPTIVE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HALPERN & LEVY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
