US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 162
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01393
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION and PECO ENERGY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. LEWIS and TRINA M. LEWIS
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KING v. POLICE AND FIRE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2016cv06414
Plaintiff:
TONY DPHAX KING
Defendant:
POLICE AND FIRE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREENBURG v. SCHOLASTIC, INC.
as 2:2016cv06353
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GREENBURG
Defendant:
SCHOLASTIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
LEWIS et al v. LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B. et al
as 2:2016cv02607
Defendant:
LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B, LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS, RICHARD A. LEWIS and TRINA M. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STORY v. REPUBLIC BANK et al
as 2:2016cv02073
Plaintiff:
PEARLINA STORY
Defendant:
REPUBLIC BANK and TRACIE A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STRUNK et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2016cv00922
Petitioner:
RANCE M. STRUNK, SR. and DARLENE M. STRUNK
Respondent:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGHERTY et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2015cv03607
Plaintiff:
MELISSA DOUGHERTY and DARRIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and ERIC MEWHA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CAVACINI et al v. TD BANK, NA
as 2:2015cv01860
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. CAVACINI, JR. and KEVIN BASE
Defendant:
TD BANK, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASHNER v. CAPITAL ONE
as 2:2015cv01858
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. CASHNER
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
