US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,299
RAMOS-VARGAS v. HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS
Defendant:
HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GEORGE PIRRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In v. Birch
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
John In
Defendant:
Police Officer Roger Birch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TALIB-BEY v. 600 ARCH PROBATION
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
TYREEK TALIB-BEY
Defendant:
600 ARCH PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. EDDYSTONE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
IMEEN BARNES
Defendant:
EDDYSTONE BOROUGH, RIDLEY TOWNSHIP, DARBY TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CORBIN v. FRENCH et al
as 5:2023cv05080
Plaintiff:
IAN BRADLEY CORBIN
Defendant:
KYLE FRENCH, ANDREW HOLVECK, JOSEPH STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RAMEY v. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUIR v. SAFA
as 2:2023cv05015
Plaintiff:
JOEL MUIR
Defendant:
Sergeant MOHAMED SAFA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSS v. FBI et al
as 2:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
ALI L. CROSS
Defendant:
FBI, SECRET SERVICE, BENNETT JOSHUA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAFFENSBERGER v. LANCASTER PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
as 5:2023cv04963
Plaintiff:
WARREN HARDING RAFFENSBERGER
Defendant:
LANCASTER PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
