Eastern District of Pennsylvania Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Drug Related Seizure of Property Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 38
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIFTY FIVE THOUAND DOLLARS ($55,000.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2014cv05913
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FIFTY FIVE THOUAND DOLLARS ($55,000.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant: EDWIN DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THREE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIVE DOLLARS ($329,705.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2014cv05835
Defendant: THREE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIVE DOLLARS ($329,705.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEVENTEEN THOUSAND NIN HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS ($17,920.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 5:2013cv03588
Defendant: SEVENTEEN THOUSAND NIN HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS ($17,920.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($7,600.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Respondent: MIGUEL A. ESPINOZA , MIGUEL A. ESPINOZA, JR.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $410,680 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM TD BANK SAFE DEPOSIT BOX #123 HELD IN THE NAME OF GBOLAHAN OLABODE
as 2:2013cv03075
Claimant: JOSEPH M. FIORAVANTI
Defendant: $410,680 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM TD BANK SAFE DEPOSIT BOX #123 HELD IN THE NAME OF GBOLAHAN OLABODE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NINETY THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($90,400.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2013cv01872
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NINETY THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($90,400.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($9,800.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2013cv01643
Claimant: AMY TLAPA , STEPHANIE TLAPA
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($9,800.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($84,600.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 2:2011cv04538
Claimant: NATHANIEL PITTS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($84,600.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, THIRTY ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NINETY FIVE DOLLARS ($31,495.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, ONE 2003 INFINITI M45, VIN NUMBER JNKAV41E73M006162 and others
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2007 RANGE ROVER et al
as 2:2011cv04096
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $73, 712 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM 2160 WILLOW BROOK DRIVE , 2007 RANGE ROVER
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEVENTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND TEN DOLLARS ($78,710.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 5:2011cv00621
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FORTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY DOLLARS ($49,990.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY DOLLARS ($28,270.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant: ANGEL ROA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $57,200 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM THE RESIDENCE OF MEREDITH VAN PELT et al
as 2:2011cv00408
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $57,200 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM THE RESIDENCE OF MEREDITH VAN PELT , $7,247 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM THE RESIDENCE OF HARRY MURRAY, $20,000 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM INTERVAULT SAFE DEPOSIT BOX #3113 and others
Claimant: JOSEPH V. MASTRONARDO, JR. , HARRY D. MURRAY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
1 2 3 4 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.