US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 17,704
Stokes v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
as 1:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Michael Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janda v. Unknown Parties
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Ronald Janda
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00553
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sides v. Miller
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sides
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovejoy v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Alex Leroy Lovejoy
Respondent:
Melinda Adams and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanco v. Talutto et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Victor Blanco
Defendant:
Talutto, Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sainiak v. Newberry et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Garrett Raymond Sainiak
Defendant:
Newberry, Rainer, A. Webrzynowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopherson v. Gourley et al
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Charles Christopherson
Respondent:
Michael Gourley and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford, Jr. v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Corey Dickerson, Deputy Warden Ray and Deputy Warden Levalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
