US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 50,682
ALLEGHENY MILLWORK, INC. v. LUMIGRAF INC.
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff: ALLEGHENY MILLWORK, INC.
Defendant: LUMIGRAF INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
OBRADOVICH v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: MICHAEL OBRADOVICH
Defendant: CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., OPTUM, INC. and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MILLER v. MEIJA et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff: JASON MILLER
Defendant: GERMAN M MEIJA and ACRO PAINTING AND REMODLEING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Boodoo v. On-Site Companionship Services, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: Andrew Boodoo
Defendant: On-Site Companionship Services, Inc and Derrick Pollock
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BARNETT v. HENRY et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Petitioner: JOMO BARNETT
Respondent: MICHELLE HENRY and SUTTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paulsen v. Martin
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff: Joshua Benjamin Paulsen
Defendant: O'Malley J. Martin
FASON v. SALAMON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Larry B. Fason
Respondent: BOBBI JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?