Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,626
SAVILLE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. SAVILLE, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
APONTE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE APONTE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Talbot v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Dacia Talbot
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAUDILL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. CAUDILL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kozlowski v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Ashley Kozlowski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moffa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Moffa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pelliccia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jon Pelliccia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHAPPELL v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE LEE SCHAPPELL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLINKSCALE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
CECILIA A. CLINKSCALE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
MS. MARIELENA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.