Fourth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,063
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Massoud Heidary v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD HEIDARY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and RING LLC
River Road Jet Boats, LLC et al v. Rock Proof Boats LLC
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
River Road Jet Boats, LLC and Waimed Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Rock Proof Boats LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Vericool World LLC v. Temperpack Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Vericool World LLC
Defendant:
Temperpack Technologies, Inc. and TemperPack Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hand Held Products, Inc. v. Lone Star SCM Systems, Ltd.
as 3:2023mc00197
Respondent:
Hand Held Products, Inc.
Petitioner:
Lone Start SCM Systems, Ltd. and Lone Star SCM Systems, Ltd
v. Hand Held Products, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00869
Respondent:
Hand Held Products, Inc.
Petitioner:
Lone Start SCM Systems, Ltd.
INCUBATE PRODUCTS, LLC et al v. SHIRLEN
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Incubate Products, LLC, Robert Hefter, Salvadore Castro and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Shirlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
