Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 19,659
Michael Porter v. Officer Lechner
as 24-6353
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. PORTER
Defendant:
OFFICER LECHNER, OFFICER SMITH and SERGEANT WILBURN
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant:
DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
Anthony McNair v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 24-6360
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, RICHMOND CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CENTRAL PRISON and others
Smith v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03094
Plaintiff:
Bradly Mitchell Smith
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corns v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03093
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Corns
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sgt. Santifull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Majid v. Nurse Practioner Everln May et al
as 0:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shahid Majid
Defendant:
Nurse Practioner Everln May, Nurse Practioner Lilian Emetu, Medical Director Wanda Sermons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Dental at RRJ and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
