Maryland Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,619
Wilson v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wilson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Brian Thompson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Victoria Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mills v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gail Mills
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 8:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Shackema Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Lenora Jackson
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Travers v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Dana Travers
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Motteler v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Logan Motteler
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stewart v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Nina Moore
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
