Maryland Torts - Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 698
Ashley v. Chain Drug Marketing Association, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ashley
Defendant:
Chain Drug Marketing Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Durando et al v. Bhatnagar
as 8:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Karen Durando, Congregation Chazon Avrohom and Eagle Strategic Advisers, LLC
Defendant:
Mr. Anshu Bhatnagar and Anshu Bhatnagar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wood v. Blue Diamond Growers
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wood
Defendant:
Blue Diamond Growers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Henry v. Hall et al
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Doreen Henry
Defendant:
Terrance Hall and Lisa Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McKenzie-El v. Solomon
as 1:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Riker Junior McKenzie-El
Defendant:
Richard E. Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brunenkant v. Suburban Hospital, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Brunenkant
Defendant:
Suburban Hospital, Inc. and Suburban Hospital Healthcare System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shibeshi v. Bond
as 1:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lucia Shibeshi
Defendant:
Brett Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smiley v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Karen Smiley
Defendant:
Arizona Beverages USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Hecox et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Ross Hecox and Reid Hecox
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DeBellis v. Woodit et al
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Dominic DeBellis
Defendant:
joseph woodit, fabian garcia, seymour bennett Individually and Doing Business as Jamdown Stables and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
